"sm70- why not Duesenberg?" (sm70-whynotduesenberg)
08/28/2017 at 20:04 • Filed to: None
1
8|
"sm70- why not Duesenberg?" (sm70-whynotduesenberg)
08/28/2017 at 20:04 • Filed to: None | 1
| 8 |
S8N?
Subtle and subdued is the new sexy.
CB
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
08/28/2017 at 20:15 |
|
Remember: the S8 Plus can hit sixty in under four seconds.
|
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> CB
08/28/2017 at 20:19 |
|
Believe me, I remember.
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
08/28/2017 at 20:34 |
|
Still not cooler than the previous generation with the Lamborghini V10
V12 Jake- Hittin' Switches
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
08/28/2017 at 20:36 |
|
S8 or S65 ?
|
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> V12 Jake- Hittin' Switches
08/28/2017 at 21:24 |
|
S8, even without considering the fact that it costs half as much.
AM
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
08/28/2017 at 21:38 |
|
I rather have this.
merged-5876237249235911857-hrw8uc
>
08/28/2017 at 21:55 |
|
I concur, but it is measurably a better car than the D3 S8. But I still love me some v10 goodness. Now I just need a set of cutouts for mine and all will be well.
|
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> AM
08/28/2017 at 22:18 |
|
It’s a tie for me.